Your Reptile and Amphibian Resource and Information Site

Back to Anoles Forum   Forums   Home   Members Area  

Anoles Forum

Prettykttkat   Atrax27407   JENOVA   Reptileguy1498   TwilightRealm   Lizardman07   Reptileguy1498   Atrax27407   Atrax27407   Prettykttkat   Prettykttkat   Da Lizard 25   Atrax27407   TwilightRealm   Atrax27407   Prettykttkat   Atrax27407   Concos Herp   Atrax27407   Prettykttkat   Lizard lady 1011   TwilightRealm   Bryce91   Atrax27407   TwilightRealm  
 Member  Message

 #1983522


Prettykttkat
View Profile





 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

This was taken from this website http://www.nohr669.com./index.htm Go to this website and watch the video!

What is HR 669?
H.R. 669 stands for House Resolution 669 and is titled "The Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act". It is a bill currently before Congress that if passed will change the way that the US Government classifies animal species that are not native to the United States. H.R. 669 will make it illegal to breed and sell many animals that are very common in the pet trade.

Why should you care about HR 669?
Anyone with pet fish, birds, reptiles, or small mammals will be affected by this bill. Any company selling product or services for pet fish, birds, reptiles or small mammals will be affected by this bill. Would you be impacted by "The Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act"?

Virtually all fish in an aquarium are not native to the United States
Most pet birds are species not native to the US
Most reptiles kept as pets are not native to the US
Hamsters, gerbils, guinea pigs and ferrets are not native to the US

Don’t let H.R. 669 pass!

If you go to this link you can send a letter/email to your state representative telling them how you feel and asking them to not let H.R. 669 pass. They even have a pre written letter to send if you are unsure of what to write and you can add to it if you want. They also have the phone number of your representative so you may follow up with a phone call if you desire. Me and my husband already sent 2 emails voicing our opinion. One for the state I live in and one for my husband’s home state of record(he’s military).

http://www.nohr669.com./dosomething.htm



04/10/09  12:38pm

 #1983599


Atrax27407
View Profile



  Message To: Prettykttkat   In reference to Message Id: 1983522


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

Full text. Looks like a good bill to me. It doesn’t appear to ban all non-native species just the dangerous ones.
HR 669 IH

111th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 669

To prevent the introduction and establishment of nonnative wildlife species that negatively impact the economy, environment, or other animal species’ or human health, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 26, 2009

Ms. BORDALLO (for herself, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. KIND, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. KLEIN of Florida, and Mr. KILDEE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A BILL

To prevent the introduction and establishment of nonnative wildlife species that negatively impact the economy, environment, or other animal species’ or human health, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act’.

SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

The purpose of this Act is to establish a risk assessment process to prevent the introduction into, and establishment in, the United States of nonnative wildlife species that will cause or are likely to cause economic or environmental harm or harm to other animal species’ health or human health.

SEC. 3. RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR IMPORTATION OF NONNATIVE WILDLIFE SPECIES.

(a) In General- The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, shall promulgate regulations that establish a process for assessing the risk of all nonnative wildlife species proposed for importation into the United States, other than nonnative wildlife species that are included in the list of approved species issued under section 4.

(b) Factors To Be Considered- The regulations promulgated under subsection (a) shall include consideration of--

(1) the identity of the organism to the species level, including to the extent possible specific information on its subspecies and genetic identity;

(2) the native range of the species;

(3) whether the species has established or spread, or caused harm to the economy, the environment, or other animal species or human health in ecosystems in or ecosystems that are similar to those in the United States;

(4) the likelihood that environmental conditions suitable for the establishment or spread of the species exist in the United States;

(5) the likelihood of establishment of the species in the United States;

(6) the likelihood of spread of the species in the United States;

(7) the likelihood that the species would harm wildlife resources in the United States;

(8) the likelihood that the species would harm native species that are rare or native species that have been listed as threatened species or endangered species in the United States under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.);

(9) the likelihood that the species would harm habitats or ecosystems in the United States;

(10) the likelihood that pathogenic species or parasitic species may accompany the species proposed for importation; and

(11) other factors important to assessing the risks associated with the species, consistent with the purpose under section 2.

(c) Notice- In promulgating the regulations under subsection (a), the Secretary shall provide notice to States, Indian tribes, other stakeholders concerned with environmental, humane, public health, economic, trade, and other relevant issues, the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force, the National Invasive Species Council, the Department of Agriculture, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

(d) Transparency- The Secretary shall ensure that the risk assessment process established by the regulations under subsection (a) is based on sound science and is consistent with sections 4 and 5.

(e) Deadlines- The Secretary shall--

(1) publish in the Federal Register proposed regulations under subsection (a) and a proposed preliminary list of approved species under section 4(b), by not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act;

(2) publish in the Federal Register final regulations under subsection (a), a final preliminary list of approved species under section 4(b), and a notice of the prohibitions under this Act, by not later than 30 days before the date on which the Secretary begins assessing risk under the regulations; and

(3) begin assessing risk with respect to nonnative wildlife species under the final regulations promulgated under subsection (a), and publish notice thereof, by not later than 37 months after the date of the enactment of this Act.

(f) Animals Owned Lawfully Prior to Prohibition of Importation- This Act and regulations issued under this Act shall not interfere with the ability of any person to possess an individual animal of any species if such individual animal was legally owned by the person before the risk assessment is begun pursuant to subsection (e)(3), even if such species is later prohibited from being imported under the regulations issued under this Act.

SEC. 4. LIST OF APPROVED SPECIES.

(a) Requirement To Issue List of Approved Species-

(1) IN GENERAL- Not later than 36 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register a list of nonnative wildlife species approved for importation into the United States.

(2) EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN SPECIES- The Secretary shall not include in the list--

(A) any species included in the list of prohibited species under section 5; or

(B) any species, the importation of which is prohibited by any other Federal law or regulation of the United States due to the likelihood of causing harm to the economy, the environment, or other animal species or human health.

(3) REVISION- The Secretary may revise the list issued under this section based on available scientific and commercial information.

(b) Preliminary List-

(1) IN GENERAL- The Secretary shall include in the preliminary list under this section nonnative wildlife species that the Secretary finds, consistent with the factors described in section 3(b) and based on scientific and commercial information that is provided in a proposal under paragraph (2) or otherwise available to the Secretary--

(A) are not harmful to the United States’ economy, the environment, or other animal species’ or human health; or

(B) may be harmful to the United States’ economy, the environment, or other animal species’ or human health, but already are so widespread in the United States that it is clear to the Secretary that any import prohibitions or restrictions would have no practical utility for the United States.

(2) PROPOSALS FOR INCLUSION IN PRELIMINARY LIST- The Secretary--

(A) shall, by not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, publish in the Federal Register, and make available on a publically available Federal Internet site, a request for submission, by any interested persons (including persons that import or that intend to import nonnative wildlife species), of proposals of nonnative wildlife species to be included in the preliminary list under this subsection and supporting documentation for such proposals;

(B) shall accept such proposals for 10 months after the date the Secretary publishes the request for submissions; and

(C) may propose a nonnative wildlife species for inclusion in the preliminary list.

(3) PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENT- Before issuing the final preliminary list of approved species under this subsection, the Secretary shall--

(A) publish in the Federal Register and make available on a publicly available Federal Internet site, the proposed preliminary list; and

(B) provide for, a period of not less than 60 days, an opportunity to submit public comments on the proposed preliminary list.

(4) PUBLICATION OF LIST- The Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register and make available on a publicly available Federal Internet site, the final preliminary list under this subsection.

(c) Proposal for Inclusion on the Approved List-

(1) SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS-

(A) IN GENERAL- After publication of the final preliminary list under subsection (b)--

(i) any interested person may submit to the Secretary in accordance with subparagraph (B) a proposal to include a nonnative wildlife species in the approved list under this section (including a request to import such a species that is not in the list published under this section and section 5, respectively); and

(ii) upon receipt of a complete proposal under clause (i), the Secretary shall publish notice of the proposal in the Federal Register and provide an opportunity for 30 days of public comment on the proposal.

(B) INFORMATION REQUIRED- Any proposal under this paragraph must include sufficient scientific and commercial information to allow the Secretary to evaluate whether the proposed nonnative wildlife species is likely to cause economic or environmental harm or harm to other animal species’ or human health.

(2) DETERMINATION- Based on scientific and commercial information provided in a proposal under paragraph (1) or otherwise available to the Secretary, the Secretary shall make one of the following determinations regarding such a proposal in a reasonable period of time and in accordance with the regulations issued under section 3:

(A) The nonnative wildlife species is approved for importation, and is added to the list of approved species under this section.

(B) The nonnative wildlife species is not approved for importation, unless permitted under section 7.

(C) The Secretary has insufficient scientific and commercial information to make a determination under subparagraph (A) or (B).

(3) TREATMENT OF UNAPPROVED SPECIES- If the Secretary makes a determination under paragraph (2)(B) that a nonnative wildlife species is not approved for importation, the Secretary shall include the nonnative wildlife species in the list of unapproved species under section 5.

(4) NOTICE OF DETERMINATION- The Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register notice of the determination made under paragraph (2) and make available on a publicly available Federal Internet site or through other appropriate means, the basis for the determination.

SEC. 5. LIST OF UNAPPROVED SPECIES.

(a) Requirement To Issue List of Unapproved Species-

(1) IN GENERAL- The Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register a list of nonnative wildlife species that are prohibited from importation into the United States except as provided in section 7.

(2) INCLUDED SPECIES- The list under this subsection shall include--

(A) those species listed as injurious wildlife under section 42 of title 18, United States Code, or under regulations under that section, as of the date of enactment of this Act; and

(B) any other species the Secretary determines under section 4(c)(2)(B) is not approved for importation.

(b) Proposal for Inclusion on the List of Unapproved Species-

(1) PROPOSAL-

(A) IN GENERAL- Any person may submit to the Secretary a proposal to add to the list under this section any nonnative wildlife species.

(B) INFORMATION REQUIRED- Any proposal under this subsection must include sufficient scientific and commercial information to allow the Secretary to evaluate whether the proposed nonnative wildlife species is likely to cause economic or environmental harm or harm to other animal species’ or human health.

(2) NOTICE- The Secretary shall publish notice of a complete proposal in the Federal Register and provide an opportunity for 30 days of public comment on the proposal.

(3) DETERMINATION- Based on scientific and commercial information provided in a proposal under paragraph (1) or otherwise available to the Secretary, the Secretary shall make one of the following determinations regarding such a proposal in a reasonable period of time and in accordance with regulations issued under section 3:

(A) The nonnative wildlife species is not approved for importation except as provided in section 7, and is added to the list of unapproved species under this section.

(B) The nonnative wildlife species is approved for importation.

(C) The Secretary has insufficient scientific and commercial information to make a determination under subparagraph (A) or (B).

(4) TREATMENT OF APPROVED SPECIES- If the Secretary makes a determination under paragraph (3)(B) that a nonnative wildlife species is approved for importation, the Secretary shall include the nonnative wildlife species in the list of approved species under section 4.

(5) NOTICE OF DETERMINATION- The Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register notice of the determination made under paragraph (3) and make available on a publicly available Federal Internet site or through other appropriate means the basis for the determination.

(c) Revision- The Secretary may revise the list issued under this section based on any scientific and commercial information available to the Secretary.

(d) Emergency Authority and Temporary Prohibition-

(1) IN GENERAL- If the Secretary determines that an emergency exists because a nonnative wildlife species poses an imminent threat of harm to the United States economy, the environment, or human or animal species’ health, the Secretary may temporarily include the nonnative wildlife species in the list of unapproved species under this section and, as appropriate, remove the species from the list of approved species under section 4.

(2) NOTICE OF TEMPORARY LISTING- The Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register notice of each temporary listing under this subsection and make available on a publicly available Federal Internet site or through other appropriate means the basis for the temporary listing.

(3) DETERMINATION- Within 180 days after temporarily including a nonnative wildlife species in the unapproved species list under this section, the Secretary shall make a final determination under subsection (b)(3) regarding the species, publish in the Federal Register notice of the final determination, and make available on a publicly available Federal Internet site or through other appropriate means the basis for the final determination.

(4) LIMITATION ON PROCEDURES- The procedures under section 4(c)(1)(A)(ii), subsection (b)(2) of this section, and section 553 of title 5, United States Code, shall not apply to determinations under this subsection.

SEC. 6. PROHIBITIONS AND PENALTIES.

(a) Prohibitions- Except as provided in this section or in section 7, it is unlawful for any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to--

(1) import into or export from the United States any nonnative wildlife species that is not included in the list of approved species issued under section 4;

(2) transport between any State by any means whatsoever any nonnative wildlife species that is not included in the list of approved species issued under section 4;

(3) violate any term or condition of a permit issued under section 7;

(4) possess (except as provided in section 3(f)), sell or offer to sell, purchase or offer to purchase, or barter for or offer to barter for, any nonnative wildlife species that is prohibited from being imported under paragraph (1);

(5) release into the wild any nonnative wildlife species that is prohibited from being imported under paragraph (1); or

(6) breed any nonnative wildlife species that is prohibited from being imported under paragraph (1), or provide any such species to another person for breeding purposes.

(b) Penalties and Enforcement- Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be subject to the civil penalties and criminal penalties described in section 4 of the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 (16 U.S.C. 3373). Sections 4(b), 4(e), 5, and 6 of that Act shall apply to such a violation in the same manner as they apply to a violation of that Act.

(c) Limitation on Application-

(1) IN GENERAL- The prohibitions in subsection (a) shall not apply to--

(A) any action by Federal, State, tribal, or local law enforcement personnel to enforce this section; and

(B) any action by Federal or State officials to prevent the introduction or establishment of nonnative wildlife species.

(2) IMPORTATION AND TRANSPORTATION BY FEDERAL AGENCIES- Nothing in this Act shall restrict the import or transportation between any States of nonnative wildlife species by a Federal agency for its own use, if the nonnative wildlife species remains in the possession of a Federal agency.

(d) Effective Date- This section shall take effect upon the publication of notice under section 3(e)(3).

SEC. 7. PERMITS.

(a) In General- The Secretary may issue a permit authorizing importation otherwise prohibited under section 6(a)(1), for scientific research, medical, accredited zoological or aquarium display purposes, or for educational purposes that are specifically reviewed, approved, and verified by the Secretary, if the Secretary finds that there has been a proper showing by the permittee of responsibility for the specimen and continued protection of the public interest and health with respect to the specimen.

(b) Terms and Conditions- The Secretary may include in a permit under subsection (a) terms and conditions to minimize the risk of introduction or establishment of the nonnative wildlife species in the United States.

SEC. 8. FEES.

(a) Fee for Proposal To Include Species in List-

(1) IN GENERAL- The Secretary shall establish in the regulations under section 3, and collect, a fee from any person that after publication of the final preliminary list under section 4(b) submits to the Secretary--

(A) a proposal under section 4(c) to include a nonnative wildlife species to the list of approved species under section 4; or

(B) a proposal under section 5(b) to include a nonnative wildlife species to the list of unapproved species under section 5.

(2) PURPOSE- The fee shall be to recover costs of assessing risk of nonnative wildlife species under the regulations issued under section 3.

(b) Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Fund-

(1) ESTABLISHMENT- There is established in the Treasury a separate account, which shall be known as the Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Fund.

(2) CONTENTS- There shall be deposited into the account all amounts received by the United States as fees under this section or as fines for violations of this Act and its implementing regulations.

(3) USE- Amounts in the account shall be available to the Secretary, subject to the availability of appropriations, for the purposes of implementing this Act.

SEC. 9. TREATMENT OF NONNATIVE WILDLIFE SPECIES AS NONMAILABLE MATTER.

Nonnative wildlife species included in the list of approved species issued under section 4 shall be considered and treated as nonmailable matter under section 3015 of title 39, United States Code.

SEC. 10. RELATIONSHIP TO STATE LAW.

(a) In General- Nothing in this Act preempts or otherwise affects the application of any State law that establishes stricter requirements for importation, transportation, possession, sale, purchase, release, or breeding of, or bartering for, any nonnative wildlife species.

(b) Limitation on Application of Prohibitions and Penalties To Prevent Release- The Secretary may limit the application of any provision of section 6 to facilitate implementation of any State program that encourages voluntary surrender to a State of nonnative wildlife species, if the Secretary determines that such limitation will prevent release of such species.

SEC. 11. REQUIREMENT TO ISSUE REGULATIONS.

The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purposes of this Act.

SEC. 12. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER FEDERAL LAWS.

Except as provided in section 13, nothing in this Act shall be construed--

(1) as repealing, superseding, or modifying any provision of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) or the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.); or

(2) as authorizing any action with respect to the importation of any plant pest as defined in the Federal Plant Pest Act (7 U.S.C. 150aa et seq.), insofar as such importation is subject to regulation under that Act.

SEC. 13. REDESIGNATION OF INVASIVE SPECIES COUNCIL AS NATIONAL INVASIVE SPECIES COUNCIL.

(a) Redesignation- The Invasive Species Council established by Executive Order 13112 on February 8, 1999 (64 Fed. Reg. 6183) is redesignated as the National Invasive Species Council.

(b) References- Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the council referred to in subsection (a) is deemed to be a reference to the National Invasive Species Council.

SEC. 14. DEFINITIONS.

For the purposes of this Act:

(1) AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES TASK FORCE- The term ‘Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force’ means the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force established under section 1201 of the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 4702).

(2) IMPORT- The term ‘import’ means to land on, bring into, or introduce into, or attempt to land on, bring into, or introduce into, any place subject to the jurisdiction of the Government of the United States, whether or not such landing, bringing into, or introduction constitutes an importation within the meaning of the customs laws of the Government of the United States.

(3) NATIONAL INVASIVE SPECIES COUNCIL- The term ‘National Invasive Species Council’ means the National Invasive Species Council established by Executive Order 13112 on February 8, 1999 (64 Fed. Reg. 6183), as redesignated by section 13.

(4) NATIVE SPECIES- The term ‘native species’ means a species that historically occurred or currently occurs in the United States, other than as a result of an intentional or unintentional introduction by humans.

(5) NONNATIVE WILDLIFE SPECIES- The term ‘nonnative wildlife species’--

(A) except as provided in subparagraph (C), means any live species or subspecies of animal that is not a native species or subspecies, whether or not born or raised in captivity;

(B) except as provided in subparagraph (C), includes--

(i) any such live, wild species or subspecies of mammal, bird, fish, reptile, amphibian, insect, mollusk, crustacean, arthropod, coelenterate, or other invertebrate, and

(ii) any viable egg, sperm, gamete, or other reproductive material or offspring thereof;

(C) does not include any species that is--

(i) specifically defined or regulated as a plant pest or approved for biological control purposes under the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.); or

(ii) defined or regulated as a threat to livestock or poultry under the Animal Health Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 8301 et seq.); and

(D) does not include any cat (Felis catus), cattle or oxen (Bos taurus), chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus), dog (Canis lupus familiaris), donkey or smarty pants (Equus asinus), domesticated members of the family Anatidae (geese), duck (domesticated Anas spp.), goat (Capra aegagrus hircus), goldfish (Carassius auratus auratus), horse (Equus caballus), llama (Lama glama), mule or hinny (Equus caballus x E. asinus), pig or hog (Sus scrofa domestica), domesticated varieties of rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus), or sheep (Ovis aries), or any other species or variety of species that is determined by the Secretary to be common and clearly domesticated.

(6) PERSON- The term ‘person’ means--

(A) an individual, corporation, partnership, trust, association, or any other private entity;

(B) any officer, employee, agent, department, or instrumentality of the Federal Government, or of any State, municipality, or political subdivision of a State, or of any foreign government; and

(C) any other entity subject to the jurisdiction of the Government of the United States.

(7) SECRETARY- The term ‘Secretary’ means the Secretary of the Interior.

(8) STATE- The term ‘State’ includes the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States.

(9) UNITED STATES- The term ‘United States’ means the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, any possession of the United States, and any waters, including the territorial sea and the Exclusive Economic Zone, within the jurisdiction or sovereignty of the Government of the United States.

.








04/10/09  03:33pm

 #1983875


JENOVA
View Profile



  Message To: Atrax27407   In reference to Message Id: 1983599


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

The beginning looks good....then you start reading the other stuff. And you also have to remember, it’s what the government calls "dangerous" or "invasive" not what actually is. It says it will be illegal to possess, sell, breed, or buy any nonnative species that is prohibited. that will be A LOT I’m sure



04/11/09  01:10am

 #1984614


Reptileguy1498
View Profile



  Message To: JENOVA   In reference to Message Id: 1983875


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

What do you guys think that the goverment will consider "dangerous"? Hopefully we won’t have to worry about green anoles since they live in much of the southeren U.S.


Have you guys heard about the Dirt Bike ban? It prevents the selling or buying of dirt bikes or parts designed for children under the age of 12 (80cc or less). Can you gess why? The lead content is too high in some of the parts of the dirt bike. My favorite snack has always been a cluch lever with a side of prake pads.

Pretty funny what some people will do. In this economy stores and tracks are now will probabley have 1/2 of their normal buisness due to this bill. Is this bill really helping out people in the U.S. at all?



04/12/09  12:12pm

 #1984790


TwilightRealm
View Profile



  Message To: Reptileguy1498   In reference to Message Id: 1984614


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

I would think it is, Reptileguy. I was nearly run over the other day on the sidewalk by someone on a bike who was supposed to be riding on the road instead (it’s the law here). Dirt bikes are bigger, faster, and I wouldn’t want them anywhere near where children are playing. As for the lead content, I’m guessing that has something to do with tainting the dirt--which I used to eat as a little kid. I know I’m not the only one out there who ever did that in their childhood.



04/12/09  05:34pm

 #1984986


Lizardman07
View Profile



  Message To: TwilightRealm   In reference to Message Id: 1984790


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

To me, it seems that they are picking on mainly the less common pets. What about all the packs of feral dogs and all of the stray cats. They impact the environment more so than what the bill states. Cats hunt birds some of which are probably under protection. You hear about more dog attacks than you do reptile attacks. If you really think about it, most of the animals in the pet trade are non native. House cats and dogs are really non native considering that in the U.S that the only native cats are mountain lions and the only native dog species are wolves, coyotes and foxes.



04/12/09  11:55pm

 #1985284


Reptileguy1498
View Profile



  Message To: TwilightRealm   In reference to Message Id: 1984790


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

Someone was riding a dirt bike on the side walk? If so, it would be illegal it is even illegal to ride it on the street w/o tags and a drivers license. It is also illegal to ride on someone elses property or somewhere where they arn’t allowed like parks, playgrounds (areas children are often playing), etc. The ban was suppose to be on all of childrens toys, not only dirt bikes (even though they are included), they were worried about little children chewing on toys that they could fit in their mouth, I don’t know why dirt bikes would be included though, what kid would like to chew on their dirt bike?

Sorry about hijacking the thread, just trying to give an example of some of the pointless laws that have been created.

Did you know that in Arkansas it is illegal to call the state "Our Kansas"

Just proves how many pointless laws there are. :]



04/13/09  04:13pm

 #1985373


Atrax27407
View Profile



  Message To: Reptileguy1498   In reference to Message Id: 1985284


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

Several sections that might be of interest:

(B) may be harmful to the United States’ economy, the environment, or other animal species’ or human health, but already are so widespread in the United States that it is clear to the Secretary that any import prohibitions or restrictions would have no practical utility for the United States.

f) Animals Owned Lawfully Prior to Prohibition of Importation- This Act and regulations issued under this Act shall not interfere with the ability of any person to possess an individual animal of any species if such individual animal was legally owned by the person before the risk assessment is begun pursuant to subsection (e)(3), even if such species is later prohibited from being imported under the regulations issued under this Act.



04/13/09  06:29pm

 #1985374


Atrax27407
View Profile



  Message To: Atrax27407   In reference to Message Id: 1985373


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

In addition:

This bill is in the first step in the legislative process. Introduced bills and resolutions first go to committees that deliberate, investigate, and revise them before they go to general debate. The majority of bills and resolutions never make it out of committee. [Last Updated: Mar 7, 2009 11:06AM]



04/13/09  06:31pm

 #1985721


Prettykttkat
View Profile



  Message To: Atrax27407   In reference to Message Id: 1985374


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

I hope this bill does not pass. While I thinks it’s a good idea to try and stop invasive non native species from becoming established and harming native wildlife, I think the state in which you live in should be taken into consideration. For example I live in CO, if a nile monitor were to escape or be released here, it would die. This goes for almost all herps in the pet trade because most are tropical species. It is very dry here and it gets very cold. The only threat in this state so far has been the release of non native turtles. I also do not agree with the fact you will not be allowed to move out of state with your non native species, breed them or be able to buy or sell them. This means once your beloved non native pet dies, you will not be able to ever get another one. I believe green anoles (native)and cuban knight anoles (not native but has been established since the 1950’s) will be unaffected, but those of us that have other pets like myself, will be. This bill will really effect my son if it passes. He is severly allergic to everything with fur or feathers. He also has asthma and eczema. The only pets he can have are reptiles,amphibians and fish. He is just now getting into breeding his White Lined gecko and he loves it! He is 9 yrs old and loves learning about herps. Having pets teaches him responsibility, compassion and how to "self" research. He likes to read about them and learn about their natural habitat, etc. How am I going to tell him when his pets die he will not ever be able to have them again. My son and my daughter both love to candle the various reptile eggs we have and hatch out babies. It is a great hands on learning experience for them. I will also be very upset if I cannot get another Green Tree monitor. I have one already and it’s been my dream to have a pair that breeds. For me that would be the ultimate challenge and a very rewarding experience. If this bill passes my monitor will have to live out his days alone because I will not be able to get another.

This bill will also make people go underground and create a black market for non native species. Not good:( It will put petstore chains and small mom and pop stores out of business. I don’t see how that will help the economy at all. Then of course there is my biggest fear, the crazy unknowledgable people. Since it will state that animals will not be approved if they are harmful to humans and/or their health, this leaves the door open for some wack job to say all reptiles are harmful because they carry salmonella. This kind of craziness could lead to the mass euthanasia of animals. I’ve have actually heard of this before happening. It was at a turtle farm in Georgia. One turtle was tested and of course it came back positive for salmonella and so it was ordered that all the turtles at the turtle farm be euthanized. I was outraged when I heard about it. How can people be so crazy/stupid.



04/14/09  12:00pm

 #1985736


Prettykttkat
View Profile



  Message To: Atrax27407   In reference to Message Id: 1985374


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

I forgot to mention all the species I have that will probably become illegal if the bill passes. Giant Day geckos,Golden gecko,Veiled chameleons,Tokay geckos,Crested geckos,Blue Tongue skink,White Lined geckos,Green Tree monitor. The animals that probably won’t be affected but "never say never" is our Painted turtle,Cuban Knight anoles and Gray tree frog.

So far the only animals that are definitely approved are: Horses,mules,asses,cows,goats,sheep,pigs,ducks,geese,chickens,goldfish,cats,dogs,llamas,domesticated rabbits. I might have left out one or two but you get the idea. Everything else is subject to approval.

Scary:(



04/14/09  12:17pm

 #1985826


Da Lizard 25
View Profile



  Message To: Prettykttkat   In reference to Message Id: 1985736


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

I wonder if Congress just gets bored and decides to make up random laws about animals that would "harm the enviroment". See, they want to take away some pets that people may have had all their life and had grown attatched to it.



04/14/09  03:30pm

 #1985873


Atrax27407
View Profile



  Message To: Da Lizard 25   In reference to Message Id: 1985826


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

Here is a link to those species that have been found in Florida and most have established breeding populations. Some of the previous information is definately in error. Link



04/14/09  05:01pm

 #1987103


TwilightRealm
View Profile



  Message To: Reptileguy1498   In reference to Message Id: 1985284


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

Quote:

Someone was riding a dirt bike on the side walk?


No, a regular bike, which was to prove my point. Regular bikes are less dangerous than dirt bikes, yet I almost got run over. I know one of my friends, when he was 7, was run over by someone on a regular bike. He was lucky he came out of it all right.

Thing is, dirt bikes are even more dangerous, and I for one wouldn’t want them anywhere near where children play.

Quote:

I don’t know why dirt bikes would be included though, what kid would like to chew on their dirt bike?


Are we talking about the same dirt bikes? I’m talking about big, fast, dirt bikes. Are you referring to children’s big wheels?


Anyway, at the subject of hand, I hope the bill passes. First off, folks, if your pet is on the list, nobody is going to come and give you a fine, and take away your pet and kill it like some of these protesters are saying. That’s just ridiculous, not to mention that the bill mentions that people already owning the pets are grandfathered in.

This bill addresses a real problem: Invasive species taking over ecosystems and endangering the native animals. There have been countless cases, and as a result, there are several species of creatures we will never see again.

Examples of invasions:
- Various species of imported anoles wiping out the green anoles in Florida.
- The flathead catfish, introduced as sportfish, flourished in a dozen states in the USA at the expense of native fish.
- Tree frogs called coqui were accidentally imported into Hawaii via potted plants. There’s now about 8,000 coqui per acre in some places, eating about 50,000 insects a night--insects that other native insects and birds rely on for food.
- The Citrus Longhorn Beetle came as stowaways to North America from China. Unlike insects that attack dead trees, these beetle threaten healthy ones.
- In the 1890s, a man thought the USA should have every bird mentioned in Shakespeare. He released 100 starlings in New York. Today there are an estimated 200 million of these birds in the U.S.

The government is just trying to do what it can to preserve our ecosystems.



04/16/09  04:04pm

 #1987205


Atrax27407
View Profile



  Message To: TwilightRealm   In reference to Message Id: 1987103


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

This whole "debate" about HR 669 reminds me of a fictional organization created in the L’il Abner comic strip some years ago by Al Capp. It went by the acronym of S.W.I.N.E or Students Wildly Indignant About Nearly Everything. In the initial post:

"Virtually all fish in an aquarium are not native to the United States
Most pet birds are species not native to the US
Most reptiles kept as pets are not native to the US
Hamsters, gerbils, guinea pigs and ferrets are not native to the US"

All of the above mentioned are so pervasive in the pet community, with domestic populations in the millions, that they would be exempted by the fact that they are so wide spread that a ban on the importation would be impractical (as stated in the bill itself). The second list of reptiles mentioned have established breeding populations in the US (a link provided to Florida) and again a ban would be impractical and they would be exempted.

I think you will find, that if you examine the Wildlife Laws of your home state, that most are more restrictive than the proposed bill.



04/16/09  07:05pm

 #1987374


Prettykttkat
View Profile



  Message To: Atrax27407   In reference to Message Id: 1987205


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

While I agree with the part about non native species hurting native populations if released or escaped in FL, Hawaii,etc. Most species kept as pets cannot survive in most of the US. And this is why they should be looking at this problem state by state and each jurisdiction in each state. As for the rest of the bill I think you guys are being naive. I hope people see what is really going on here and do not let this pass. It needs to be seriously revised.



04/16/09  10:58pm

 #1987525


Atrax27407
View Profile



  Message To: Prettykttkat   In reference to Message Id: 1987374


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

Anything that is generally in the pet trade is going to be safe because of the sheer, raw numbers already here. Very few of the common pets are imported. Most are bred in the US. If you bother to look at the bill’s sponsors, you will notice quite quickly that they are from states that have had (and do have) significant problems with imported exotics. Most likely to be affected are the tropical reef fish which are now plundered and sent to hobbyists to the detriment of their former natural environments.

Also, in cases where Federal and State law are different, the most restrictive law takes precedence. This whole debate has been perpetuated by a bunch of idiots screaming about how the Federal Government is going to "take our pets away" which is simply not the case. They remind me of Chicken Little running around yelling "the sky is falling, the sky is falling". The fact is, those that protest the loudest are likely in violation of their own state laws even now.

Most states require a veterinarian’s certificate of health and (if wild cauught) a certificate attesting that the specimen was collected in accordance with the laws of the state of origin for any animal brought into the state. Most are shipped without regard to either requirement.

You will also find that a large portion of the problem is irresponsible pet owners deciding that they don’t want to care for their charges any longer and simply release them into the wild. Despite what you may think, many of them do survive and establish viable wild populations. Why do you think laws have been made prohibiting the release of non-native animals in most states?

Also, because of the warming climate (whether you believe it is man-made or natural), some species are expanding their ranges. For example, Green Anoles are expanding northward in North Carolina at the rate of several miles per year. Though once found well south of here, I expect them to be in the I-40 corridor within the next 5-10 years, They have expanded to within 20 miles of that point as of last fall when my son collected one where he lives.



04/17/09  08:10am

 #1987876


Concos Herp
View Profile



  Message To: Atrax27407   In reference to Message Id: 1987525


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

Atrax are you rooting for this bill? It bans all nonnative species not just some. I can’t believe anyone would root for it.



04/17/09  08:40pm

 #1987921


Atrax27407
View Profile



  Message To: Concos Herp   In reference to Message Id: 1987876


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

You are wrong - read the bill.



04/17/09  10:40pm

 #1988413


Prettykttkat
View Profile



  Message To: Atrax27407   In reference to Message Id: 1987921


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

The animals specifically listed are the only ones guaranteed to be safe. Every other animal(which is almost every single fish,bird,reptile,rodent,amphibian,insect)are going to be subject to approval. I do not trust this. It does not clearly state the determining factors of how the decisions will be made. every thing is way to vague. I wouldn’t put it past some animal activist group(which is supporting this bill and believes no animals should be pets) to ban everything non native period. Did you see who is backing this bill. Did you know that this bill is trying to be snuck in with other bills of no relation so that it may pass undetected? There is going to be one vote for all hr bills at one time, the list goes from hr 1 to hr 690 something(I can’t remember the exact number) It is being grouped with other bills like making appliances more greener. Who is going to object to greener appliances! Also under this bill is another bill (snuck in)which will pay federal employees to remove and dispose off all non native species outlawed in hr 669! You need to check it out. I have someone doing a thorough investigation of this bill at the moment, it happens to be his job and he will let me know what he finds out for sure in a few days. I will then post the findings on here and we all will know exactly what this bill will do if passed. I hope that I am wrong about it, I really do, I will gladly admit being wrong about this bill’s intentions but I’m afraid that I’m not. Oh well I will know in a few days for sure.



04/18/09  06:50pm

 #2017229


Lizard lady 1011
View Profile



  Message To: Prettykttkat   In reference to Message Id: 1983522


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

CONCOS HERP IS RIGHT!!!!!



06/06/09  12:36pm

 #2017354


TwilightRealm
View Profile



  Message To: Lizard lady 1011   In reference to Message Id: 2017229


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

No, Atrax is right. Read the bill.



06/06/09  04:00pm

 #2092909


Bryce91
View Profile



  Message To: TwilightRealm   In reference to Message Id: 2017354


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

No, he is not right. Read more than just that bill.



11/07/09  05:19am

 #2092924


Atrax27407
View Profile



  Message To: Bryce91   In reference to Message Id: 2092909


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

"The sky is falling" sayeth Chicken Little.



11/07/09  07:48am

 #2093151


TwilightRealm
View Profile



  Message To: Bryce91   In reference to Message Id: 2092909


 READ THIS AND STOP H.R.669!

As far as the facts are concerned, they are present only within that bill, which details all it plans to do. Anything else ’outside’ the bill is just propaganda fabricated to put the bill in a bad light. History repeats itself because of people who take things out of hand and ignore the facts, and that never ends well for anyone. So I suggest that people actually read the full bill, rather than accepting the so-called ’facts’ that hate-sites created by angry lobbyists represent.



11/07/09  08:47pm


Back to Anoles Forum   Forums   Home   Members Area